Should teachers have guns? Parents debate, Springfield Schools share current policy

Reported by: Chris McKee
Set Text Size SmallSet Text Size MediumSet Text Size LargeSet Text Size X-Large
Share
Updated: 12/19/2012 4:33 pm
SPRINGFIELD, Ore. (KMTR) -- As dialogue heats up about the idea of teachers carrying guns to protect their school classrooms, Springfield Public Schools sounds off about how it currently operates.

In the wake of the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting in Newtown, Connecticut, many people have been posing the question: should teachers have guns in the classroom?

In the last week, at least one Oregon legislator has supported the idea. Oregon House Representative Dennis Richardson, a Republican from Central Point, recently advocated teachers having access to guns in the classroom.

According to the Medford Mail Tribune, Representative Richardson contacted three school district superintendents in his area, saying that their ban on weapons in schools should be overturned.

The story generated hundreds of responses on KMTR NewsSource 16's Facebook page with dozens of people speaking out in favor of teachers carrying guns in the classroom.

With so many people talking about the idea of weapons on school grounds, Springfield Public Schools is stepping up to share its current policy.

The district is among many in Oregon that ban all weapons for students, staff, faculty and administrators on campus. Springfield Schools' policy was created by the Springfield School Board, a publicly-elected body.

"If we had a practice of . . . teachers [who] were armed, how it would play out? What would the parameters be? There are a lot of things to work through,” says Matt Coleman, Assistant Superintendent of Springfield Public Schools.

To be clear, Springfield Public Schools says it is not advocating for or against carrying weapons on school grounds.

Weapons, including guns, are not allowed on Springfield Schools' campuses; the district says safety remains a top priority. That's why it continues to staff two full-time School Resource Officers (SROs). The officers are armed and trained Springfield Police officers.

The district says the SROs are there for the safety element, but most importantly for crime prevention. Coleman says much of the district's success depends not only on the safety precautions it takes, but also the knowledge it gets about its student bodies from parents, teachers, students and the public.

"That, I think, needs to be as much of a focus as anything else in . . . a national debate right now is: how do we work collectively as communities, as cities, as towns to ensure our safety - whether you're going to the mall or you're going to school,” says Matt Coleman, Assistant Superintendent of Springfield Public Schools.

Coleman points to a successful resolution of a recent weapons scare near A3: Academy of Arts and Academics school in downtown Springfield last week. A student walking to the school was carrying a fake prop gun for a school project. On the commute, the student was spotted by someone who called Springfield Police. Immediately, several schools went into lockdown and police spoke to the student carrying the prop. Officers were able to confirm that everything was safe and the student had no ill intention. Coleman says the only way anyone knew what was going on was because a citizen was alert.

Springfield's School Resource Officers' salaries are paid by the district. The two are based at Springfield and Thurston High School, but visit several other district schools.

14 Comment(s)
Comments: Show | Hide

Here are the most recent story comments.View All

The views expressed here do not necessarily represent those of NewsSource 16

Tank Commander - 12/23/2012 6:25 AM
0 Votes
I'm for it. If they won't let them have guns, then how about some non-lethal means: taser, made, pepper spray, body armor. Perhaps a silent alarm in each classroom like the ones banks have that go straight to the local police station?

xr600 - 12/20/2012 1:16 PM
0 Votes
I'm fine with teachers having a gun at school, but it better be worn on their hip with a level II or III retention device to prevent some dirtbag student from taking it from them. They should also not be OBLIGATED to use deadly force. It would be cost prohibitive to provide sufficient training to the teachers in firearms and shoot/don't shoot situations. They should function as a regular concealed handgun licensee, it is up to them if they shoot. It is a proven fact that the quicker an active shooter is confronted and stop, the lower the body count. If one of the teachers in the building decides to neutralize the threat, many lives could be saved. As for the parents that are scared of people carrying guns: quit being a bunch of pansies, it was just over 100 years ago when people routinely carried guns on their hips, and no one cared. An armed society is a polite society.

AhShucks - 12/19/2012 8:43 PM
0 Votes
All of this gun control talk is just Politicians BS. They want to be re-elected. Of course we should have a cop or armed security person in our schools. But the states, counties and cities cannot afford them. I feel we have senior people that could handle the responsibility of a gun on school grounds. such as ex-cops, ex-veterans and ex-security guards that are retired. They might work for free. If you remember the gun control when Clinton was president it showed no change in deaths by guns. It doesn't work, sick, criminals etc want a gun they will get it.

justme - 12/19/2012 4:13 PM
0 Votes
Since when are children allowed to bring a "fake prop gun" to school, that's wierd, I can't believe they needed that for a school project. I fear there are already too many guns in society to ever have gun control now, who's going to give 'em back and who would confiscate them and how? Do they have a list of who has what gun or guns?

perkysmiles - 12/19/2012 3:19 PM
0 Votes
As the mother of an elementary aged child I think school personnel should NOT be permitted to carry weapons at schools. While it is true that ANYONE can be trained how to use a gun. If school faculty were able to carry guns in schools it would create MORE problems than it would fix. Problems I see: • Teachers are not trained in risk assessment that involves the use of a weapon and I see bullets flying where none are called for in a panic situation. • Should the need arise for a firearm to be used in a classroom or school the risk is high for casualties due to friendly fire. • It would need to be addressed where teachers would store the gun when not in use. • Storage of weapons on school grounds is a security risk in and of itself. • How do we store a weapon in a classroom and still make it easily available to a teacher in an emergency situation. Possible Solution: Schools are a public area and as such our local law enforcement should have the burden of protecting our schools. I believe that EVERY school should have experienced police officers stationed there for the safety of our children.

coffeenipp - 12/19/2012 3:12 PM
0 Votes
I do not think staff should be considered "first responders", but I also don't think because you are in education you cannot protect yourself. Most jobs would allow you to carry a concealed weapon if you had the appropriate license. If I were a teacher and I heard shots, I would like to be able to lock down the room, get my students safe and if the shooter came into my room...I could defend myself and my kids. I in now way think an educator should be expected to move toward a threat to "neutralize" them, but should be able to have access to a firearm to protect themselves

Shakanson - 12/19/2012 1:32 PM
0 Votes
I'm all for it...They should also teach gun safety in schools/safe handling..

8203432 - 12/19/2012 12:59 PM
1 Vote
@Baldr Better keep your kids home, because legal concealed carry holder can go on a public school campus with their weapon concealed.

AhShucks - 12/19/2012 12:55 PM
0 Votes
Yes certain trained personnel at school should be able to have a gun. That might stop some of the mental cases from going to the school and shooting the kids or teachers. We have to be able protect our children from cases like Conn.

Milton - 12/19/2012 10:13 AM
0 Votes
Bear in mind that the Oregon Constitution prohibits public agencies from limiting the rights of "Lawful Carry" of a weapon. ergo, if a person has a CCL the constitution say's they may carry it legally onto school grounds. Now try to change the Constitution and see how far you get.
Most Popular Stories
New Diabetes Drug Expected This Week
New Diabetes Drug Expected This Week WebMD Medical News By Kathleen Doheny Reviewed by Brunilda Nazario, MD More from WebMD People With Diabetes May Need Earlier Colon Screen Death Rate...

Inergize Digital This site is hosted and managed by Inergize Digital.
Mobile advertising for this site is available on Local Ad Buy.